The FCC Faces a Busy Regulatory Agenda for 2024, Addressing Old Policies and New Proposals

FCC Ownership RulesThe FCC is statutorily required to review its ownership rules every four years The 2018 quadrennial ownership review amp8211 which extended past the start of the pending 2022 review amp8211 ended in disappointment for many broadcasters Under pressure from a federal court to bring the longpending proceeding to a close the FCC chose to keep intact the current local radio ownership local television ownership and dual network rules Many broadcasters had hoped for a relaxation of the rules saying that at least some loosening is necessary to help them compete in the rapidly transforming and intensely competitive audio and video marketplaceDespite major changes to the environment in which radio and television stations operate including the advent and exponential growth of alternative audio and video programming sources and the growing share of advertising revenues going to large tech companies the FCC has kept the same broadcast ownership restrictions in place for decades The local radio ownership rule which limits the number of stations a single entity or individual can own in a local market and imposes a amp8220subcapamp8221 on the number of AM or FM stations that can be under common control in a market has remained static since the 1996 Telecommunications Act set the current limits The local television ownership rule which generally allows an entity to own two TV stations in the same Designated Market Area DMA as long as at least one of the stations is not among the topfour rated stations in the market is also decades old The dual network rule which prohibits a merger between any of the bigfour broadcast television networks originated in the 1940sIn keeping the current ownership limits in place the FCC continued its longstanding focus on competition localism and viewpoint diversity The agency concluded that preserving the current rules is necessary to prevent excessive marketplace consolidation it believes could harm the listening and viewing public The FCC also said there was no consensus on whether relaxing the rules would allow broadcast stations to respond to marketplace changes more effectively and noted that at least some broadcasters had opposed loosening the current restrictions Certain broadcast groups have signaled they may appeal the FCCamp8217s decision in courtProposals Relating to Retransmission Consent BlackoutsThe FCC has recently adopted several rulemaking proposals that would impact cable and DBS providers amp8220MVPDsamp8221 Under federal law MVPDs must obtain a television stationamp8217s consent to carry the stationamp8217s signal In turn television stations are entitled to seek compensation under a system known as amp8220retransmission consentamp8221 Sometimes retransmission consent negotiations are unsuccessful and a stationamp8217s signal is removed from a cable or DBS provideramp8217s lineup The most infamous blackouts have occurred just before major sports events like the Super Bowl amp8211 with the threat that millions of viewers will be unable to watch the game amp8211 resulting in video providers and broadcasters signing deals at the last minute to prevent a signal blackout or restore a stationamp8217s already blackedout signalCiting a dramatic increase in retransmission consentrelated signal blackouts resulting in subscribers losing access to local and network television programming the FCC is considering whether to requireamp160 MVPDs and possibly broadcasters to report blackouts to the FCC within 48 hours In another proceeding the FCC is considering requiring MVPDs to give rebates to subscribers who experience blackouts due to failed retransmission consent negotiations between MVPDs and television broadcastersIf the FCCamp8217s rebate proposal is adopted MVPDs will need to issue refunds to subscribers who are unable to watch a local broadcast television station when retransmission consent negotiations fail How such a rebate mechanism would work what amount subscribers would be refunded and whether the FCC has the authority to impose such a requirement on pay TV providers are all issues the FCC will need to work throughProposal to Prohibit amp8220Junk Feesamp8221Another new initiative targets so called amp8220junk feesamp8221 imposed on subscribers by some MVPDs The FCC is proposing to ban MVPDs from charging early termination fees ETFs and billing cycle fees BCFs ETFs require subscribers to pay a fee to terminate a video services contract before its expiration date making it costly to switch services during a contract term BCFs require subscribers to pay for a complete billing cycle even if they terminate their contract before the end of the cycle leaving them paying for services they no longer wantThe FCCamp8217s amp8220junk feesamp8221 initiative is part of a broader Biden administration push for federal agencies to ban such fees in numerous industries including telecommunications banking airlines and concert ticketing For the FCC important issues to resolve are whether the agency has the legal authority to adopt antiETF and BCF regulations how a ban would need to be coordinated with state and local authorities and whether a amp8220junk feeamp8221 prohibition could be applied to an entire bundle when cable or DBS video services are bundled with nonvideo services such as phone and internetWhat the Future May BringWe believe the FCC will try to issue orders in these proceedings before the upcoming presidential election We also anticipate additional actions on some longpending proposals that impact media companies including the potential reinstatement of the requirement that broadcasters report the race and gender composition of their employeesThis article was written by Sally A Buckman and F Scott Pippin who are members of the Media Practice Group at Lerman Senter PLLC Lerman Senter is a specialized Washington DC law firm that advises clients in the media technology and telecommunications industriesPosted at MediaVillage through the Thought Leadership selfpublishing platformClick the social buttons to share this story with colleagues and friendsThe opinions expressed here are the author39s views and do not necessarily represent the views of MediaVillageorgMyersBizNet

SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE MEDIAVILLAGE CONTENT | BECOME A THOUGHT LEADERSHIP CONTRIBUTOR

The FCC Faces a Busy Regulatory Agenda for 2024, Addressing Old Policies and New Proposals

Publish date

Channel

FEMA and the Ad Council Encourage AANHPI Communities to Enhance Disaster Preparedness in New PSAs - Ad Council InSites

More Videos:

SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE MEDIAVILLAGE CONTENT | BECOME A THOUGHT LEADERSHIP CONTRIBUTOR

The FCC Faces a Busy Regulatory Agenda for 2024, Addressing Old Policies and New Proposals

Enjoying This Commentary? There's More to Love

TAGS:

FEMA and the Ad Council Encourage AANHPI Communities to Enhance Disaster Preparedness in New PSAs - Ad Council InSites

Cookies