Connected TV is exploding! There are approximately 75 million unique, addressable CTV households in the U.S. (out of an approximate total of 128 million). Per the latest estimates from eMarketer, CTV ad spending in the U.S. will be over $13 billion this year, and then more than double that amount by 2025. That represents extraordinary growth, but it's not surprising given that CTV takes the best aspects of linear TV (sight, sound and motion), and blends that with the best of digital (targetability, interactivity and measurability).
ANA recently partnered with Innovid on a new study to help marketers better understand the opportunities CTV offers and simplify the intricacies of measurement. Twenty leading advertisers participated with CTV campaigns running between January and April 2021, with a total spend of $35 million. The findings about unique reach and frequency were particularly interesting.
An ANA report released in May, Media KPIs That Matter, identified unique reach as one of the most important KPIs for media. It's a vitally important metric for brand building, and one marketer quoted in that study called it "an engine for growth."
A key finding of the new Innovid/ANA work is that the depth of unique reach for CTV has yet to be unearthed. Across the new study, the average campaign reached only 13 percent of the available U.S. CTV households. An important recommendation: Brands should put more media weight (impressions) behind their CTV campaigns to reach more viewers. We found that upwards of 100 million impressions should be allocated to reach at least 40 percent of the available U.S. CTV population.
There is a myth that CTV has a frequency problem and that consumers are being continuously bombarded with the same ads. The new Innovid/ANA report found that CTV's frequency problem is highly exaggerated: Average campaign frequency was surprisingly low over the life of the campaigns in our study -- just 4.6 across all campaigns. The reality is that CTV's frequency issue stems from the fact that the same supply is being sold by different providers.
Capping frequency by publisher in isolation has proven insufficient to appropriately manage exposure levels. Brands must manage frequency from a consistent point of origin. For example, that could be an ad serving platform where frequency can be evaluated consistently and holistically versus getting frequency metrics from each individual publisher. A key recommendation: Manage frequency holistically via a centralized platform, then use a combination of frequency management and frequency distribution to identify where overexposure can occur.
As noted, 20 leading advertisers participated in this study, including Anheuser-Busch, Whirlpool Corporation and General Motors. Perspective from media practitioners at those organizations on connected TV reach and frequency follow:
There's lots of great learning here! The new report, "Decoding CTV Measurement: An In-Depth Look at Reach, Frequency and ROI" is available at www.innovid.com.
Click the social buttons to share this content with your friends and colleagues.
The opinions and points of view expressed in this content are exclusively the views of the author and/or subject(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of MediaVillage.com/MyersBizNet, Inc. management or associated writers.