Marketers Beware: For Better and Worse, Everything Communicates!

When you see social media commentary explaining that "advertising" these days has to compete with brand influencer messages on TikTok, just remember, it's all advertising; even if it's competing with itself.

Levels of control vary across communication channels (the influence a press officer has over what finally appears is clearly less than with a paid-for communication, whether that appears via an ad or an influencer), but levels of influence aside, what a company says about itself in any shape or form says something about the company.

I've never really understood how come so many non-marketers don't get this. Maybe it's because those at the top still see marketing as something nice to have, something to be proud of, something to show off about, but not something that has much to do with the real business of business.

Everything communicates. There will always be odd occasions, rogue employees or whatever but companies are far too often seriously inconsistent in the messages they put out there. Even when they have 100% control over the message as with paid-for ads.

Take far too many ads on social media. Not only are they dire, but they're disliked and avoided wherever possible by those they're supposed to reach.

It's as if creative teams don't really understand how to get the most from these media forms. (I almost typed "new media forms" except that they are in no way new.) In the same way that print ads rarely work well on OOH sites, so traditional ads are just wrong for social media.

If everything communicates, then as much care should be taken over a paid-for message on social media, with how staff address customers, and with retail layouts and displays as with a TV spot. It certainly looks as if that isn't the case.

It's as if in the large agencies social media is today's radio. Chuck the brief to the junior team -- no-one cares. It was wrong; it is wrong.

Outside of paid-for communications, even CEOs seem unaware that what they say and how they behave can undermine the carefully constructed edifice of their company's reputation. And that can influence not just a few survey numbers but also their share-price and the opinions of their investors and stakeholders.

As Mark Borkowski put it in a piece in The Guardian, referencing an unseemly Twitter row between the CEOs of Just Eat and Uber: "Twitter is perfect for renegades, mavericks and disruptor brands. It's much harder for well-established brands with solid reputations, if something goes wrong for them they risk damage to their hard-earned brand."

If a lowly manager messed up operationally at Just Eat or Uber you can be sure something would be said and indeed done. Hands (and quite possibly necks) would be wrung, pearls grasped, internal reviews commissioned.

But something that undermines the company's reputation? Far too often that's seen as less of an issue, which is the opposite of the truth.

Even CEOs need to appreciate the power of media communications to influence those things they care about. Marketing isn't pink and fluffy, but business critical.

If everything communicates, then we should do our best to plan everything, to measure what we can and to have some idea of how things work individually and collectively.

That involves introducing a system of cross-media thinking that goes a lot farther than the measurement initiative being driven by the WFA and ISBA. (Both the WFA and ISBA are well aware that what they're doing is only a start, albeit an important one.)

We should all be aware of that, and keep our eyes firmly on the prize, of creating a way of thinking within which all forms of communication are considered, assessed and where practical measured.

Everything communicates. We just need to understand how.

Click the social buttons to share this content with your friends and colleagues.

The opinions and points of view expressed in this content are exclusively the views of the author and/or subject(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of MediaVillage.com/MyersBizNet, Inc. management or associated writers.