Burger King is not a business or marketing success. It's more accurately a failure. Its sales per restaurant put it at the bottom of the heap among its major competitors, at only $1.36 million per store, behind burger competitors Jack in the Box, Wendy's and McDonald's. Its sales per store are only slightly more than half of McDonald's. [By the way, what's Chick-fil-A doing, leading the pack at $4.41 million per store, when it's only open six days per week? McDonald's, are you paying attention? Is your new agency paying attention? Do you hope to catch up?]
BK has been in this depressed competitive position for a long time, despite the 15+ ad agencies it has gone through every time it changed CMOs or marketing strategies to overcome its many fast food shortcomings.
What about the award givers? We know who and what Cannes Lion is. It's the granddaddy of profit-making advertising festivals, raking in cash from growing gate-receipts (16,000 attendees), fees from awards-submissions (40,000 entries), harbor passes for yachts and sponsorships for every ambition and pocketbook.
Creative Marketer of the Year? It should have gone to Ascential PLC, the owner of Cannes Lions, for its aggressive marketing and success! So successful and costly is the Festival that Sir Martin Sorrell (WPP) and Arthur Sadoun (Publicis Groupe) had to push back this year, but I'll bet that the Festival steams ahead in any case, especially if marketing awards can be won by companies whose marketing is not actually successful.
The award of Creative Marketer of the Year to Burger King is weird, and it shows the degree to which marketing has become disconnected from business success. We all know Burger King, of course, but the numbers suggest that few of us ever eat there, even those who may be amused by their clever TV ads.
Granted, BK's agencies have created many memorable ads over the years, and "Have it your way" had legs for a long time, but let's face it -- Burger King is nowhere as a competitor. It is the very definition of a Nothing Burger chain.
Maybe the Cannes jury was so impressed by the BK 2017 marketing submissions that it awarded BK for its aesthetically cute ads and marketing programs. If so, this would be a reflection of our troubled marketing times.
Marketing as a discipline is in the tank, judging from the way brands are stagnant and marketing funds are no longer spent. Marketers do not know how to generate results from marketing investments, so they've given up trying. They are congratulating themselves instead for increasing shareholder value by not spending marketing funds. They could double this success by winning Cannes awards at the same time. Should there be a Cannes award for "Most Creative Non-Expenditure of Marketing Funds?">